Site Under Construction

Hi All,

This site is currently under construction. If you have any questions regarding my services, please reach out to me: sohini(at)sohinidas.com.

Thanks!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“RIP pilot season”

Did you all see this article from the Hollywood Reporter? If not, it’s a must read. It outlines the pros and cons of Fox’s Kevin Reilly’s recent proclamation of war on the traditional development season. What do you think? Is it time for the broadcast nets to revamp their business model?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is TV Eating Itself?

Wonderfully written Op-Ed by Andy Greenwald of Grantland. Agree or disagree, this open-faced look at TV is definitely worth a read.

Truly original ideas are hard to come by, but they’re even harder to get on the air, as executives increasingly reach for recognizable packages that save them the trouble of marketing or explanation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

State of the (TV) Union

I am constantly asked by clients how to best position their television (or multiplatform) show given the changing media landscape. The question always seems to be, are networks going to become irrelevant? My short answer is, I don’t know (psst…neither does anyone else). It depends how well they adapt to consumers’ viewing, media consumption and purchasing patterns.

But I do know that right now, at the present moment, networks are still doing three basic things: paying for TV shows, marketing those TV shows, and distributing them. Now, some may argue that they are not doing any of those things particularly well. Fair point. I can certainly tell you from experience that the amounts they are paying producers have been dramatically cut. Despite all that, though, a TV show is still a TV show. Any way you slice it, people are still watching TV. A lot of people. Advertisers are still paying for eyeballs. Watercooler discussion is still focused on TV (read: Breaking Bad finale). In other words, even though you can buy toilet paper online and have it delivered to your doorstep, lots of people still go to the store, buy a big ol’ package of Charmin, and lug it home.

It is changing, yes. As a content creator, you have many more options now than ever before regarding how best to produce, market and distribute your show. But for now, the old guard still remains. And as long as networks remain standing with dollar bills in their pockets, you still need to know how to pitch to them.

More from Brian Roberts, the CEO of Comcast, on this subject, in this interview with PBS.

In his words: “Will there be a lot of choices that don’t involve networks? Absolutely.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

A (Biased but Fascinating) Look into “Smash”

While I don’t normally head to BuzzFeed for my television news, I have to admit this article includes some good “dirt” on the behind-the-scenes drama of NBC show, Smash.

Yes, I think Smash has its issues. Yes, it was clear there was trouble in the writers’ room. Yes, there were way too many cooks in the kitchen on season 1. But yes, I am nonetheless addicted to the show. So sue me!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What’s Working (and Not Working) in the TV Universe

Here’s a great update on the current television season, what shows have been axed, and what to expect in the new year. What new fall shows are you hooked on?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Anthony Bourdain’s Rant About the Travel Channel

If you haven’t read Bourdain’s latest blog post, it’s definitely worth a look. It takes a lot for a long time television veteran to defile the network that took a chance on him. As always, though, I’m sure there is more to the story than meets the eye.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why is “Engagement” and “Multi-Platform” So Important, Anyway?

Guest blog post by Arka Sengupta, President and CEO of Unrendered Motion Picture Company:

An old boss once said of his primary hiring criteria: “I hire the guy who solves the most problems”. The same can be said of development executives. By and large, networks commit to projects that solve the most problems for them. And nowadays, they have many problems. For producers it is not only important to understand what networks are looking for from a creative standpoint, but to understand their larger pain points, and to articulate how your show can help.

Of course, a show has to fit what the network is looking for creatively, first and foremost. Subject matter, format, talent all need to feel germane to the network’s programming grid. And of course, the network needs to feel it will help (or at the very least, not hurt) ratings. But the difference between winning the pick-up season derby and winning the runner-up (booby) prize may be how your show can help the network in other ways.

The pain points depend on the network. And as I said, they are numerous. But by and large, the biggest pain point networks face is delivering content to advertisers that is engaging and multi-platform. The business of ad supported cable and broadcast TV is changing rapidly because we are in the midst of a generational shift in how marketing works.

Why? Audiences are fracturing. We started in an era of three networks and a handful of radio stations. We witnessed the explosion of tier 1 and tier 2 cable. We lived through the Internet boom, and are now in the midst of a social media revolution. With only so much time in the day, audiences are splintering viewership across all these platforms, and are often multi-tasking between them.

To put this fragmentation into perspective, in 1983 there were 30 networks. That year, 60% of households watched the series finale of M*A*S*H. The very next year, the Cable Act was enacted. By 1989 there were 80 networks. In 2002 that number was 280. 1983 was the last time we have ever seen a share north of 50%. In recent years, the only shows to break the top 50 in terms of viewership are Super Bowl telecasts. And that is precisely why it is the most expensive 30 seconds you can buy.

The cost of reaching a household via an ad is increasing every year. The total amount of money committed to the TV upfronts each year by advertisers is growing. But CPM’s demanded by the networks are growing faster. Which means the aggregate reach being bought by advertisers is diminishing. It is classic supply and demand at play.

What does this mean for advertisers? Every year, more advertisers are getting priced out of the reach market. Most brands were priced out of vehicles like American Idol and X Factor years ago.  Nowadays, many are finding it hard to advertise on networks like USA, TNT and even Bravo and A&E. For brands, the question is how to do more with less audience. For many the answer seems to lie in pushing that audience online, and engaging them more. Each time you engage a person in a conversation (earned media), you create an additional opportunity to expose that person to your brand, at minimal additional cost. As paid media is becoming more expensive, brands are shifting focus to earned media opportunities.

What does this mean for networks? They can attract more advertisers (and charge higher CPM’s) if the shows they feature have significant online presence, and if it engages audiences in organic ways. Each year, digital media represents a greater percentage of total upfront spending. Over 90% of that digital media spend is directly tied to a TV show. Advertisers love shows that drive audiences to do stuff online.

What does this mean for producers? It means you are a multi-platform content creator whether you like it or not. Chances are, the network will HAVE to figure out how your show manifests itself online. If you can preemptively provide some solutions, so much the better. This can be as simple as developing strategies for producing extra “digital only” footage. But over time, as the demand for “engagement” increases, content creators will need to develop more organic ways to make their show ideas engaging, digital and social. Can you crowd source certain elements? Can you create hooks that get the audience involved? How does your show work on Facebook? How do you integrate Twitter?

In the current climate, creative synergies and the ability to rate are the most important factors that go into selling a show. But over time, the need for networks to engage and drive audiences online will only grow. As advertisers become more sophisticated, they will demand more organic and more authentic ways to do this. Your show’s ability to deliver on this will become more and more important as the industry continues to evolve.

 
Arka Sengupta is the President and CEO of Unrendered Motion Picture Company. He is a producer specializing in multi-platform content and branded entertainment. He has produced content for networks like MTV, SPIKE, Sundance, VEVO and others. He has produced some of the largest branded entertainment projects on TV and online for brands like Smirnoff, Subway and Barnes & Noble. Prior to producing content, Arka spent almost a decade in digital and traditional advertising.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

All That Glitters…

Adweek published a great round up of the fall TV hopefuls. Revolution was one of the first horses out of the gate. Good news for NBC – it was amply sampled, always a good sign. Let’s see how the next few weeks shake out!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

News Network Getting into the Reality TV Game

The allure of ratings is too great for even CNN to pass on. Adweek reports that CNN has picked up a Morgan Spurlock series, Inside Man.

Spurlock’s work teeters between documentary and reality TV, and leans more toward the latter, IMO. If you take a look at his Hulu series, A Day in the Life, you’ll notice that it’s highly produced, thereby nudging it more towards reality TV than true documentary. While I am a fan of some of his work, I take issue with a few of his comments in this article:

“The idea of doing very engaging nonfiction programming is smart; this is a network like a lot of other 24-hour networks who’ve realized that you run out of news,” he opined…Spurlock balks at the word “reality.” “We make very straight, deliverable, nonfiction programming,” he said.

Really? You run out of news? I find that hard to believe. What is more likely is that CNN is making the slow but steady march towards news-tainment. (Ironically, this is a subject that is explored in depth in the fictional and hotly debated HBO series, The Newsroom).  I also take issue with Spurlock’s insistence that he makes “straight” programming, but that’s a whole other issue.

Does reality TV belong on a 24 hour news network? It’s arguable. It will be interesting to see the ratings, and see if other news networks follow suit.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment